Gene Therapy For Cystic Fibrosis Case Study

Source: Science Photo Library

A tiny globule of fat suspended in a fine mist makes its way along the branching passageways of a human lung. Deep in the lung the globule, called a liposome, nestles up against one of the cells lining the airway. Because the cell membrane is also made of fat, the liposome is able to pass through it, and spill its cargo into the interior of the cell: a string of DNA encoding a protein known as CFTR, which will enable the cell to make thin, watery mucus that helps keep the lung clean and healthy.

This is gene therapy for cystic fibrosis, a genetic disorder that causes serious lung disease. In a phase III trial published in 2015, the UK Cystic Fibrosis Gene Therapy Consortium, a group of scientists and clinicians from London, Oxford, and Edinburgh, reported that inhaling these liposomes every month for a year stabilised the lung function of individuals with cystic fibrosis[1]. Meanwhile, lung function deteriorated slightly in the study’s placebo group.

These are modest effects, as even the study’s authors acknowledge. “I think we need to improve on that” before the therapy could be rolled out to clinical care, says Eric Alton, professor of gene therapy and respiratory medicine at Imperial College London and the consortium’s coordinator.

Source: Eric Alton

Eric Alton, professor of gene therapy and respiratory medicine at Imperial College London, is coordinator of the UK Cystic Fibrosis Gene Therapy Consortium

Still, the trial represented a huge milestone for the field. For the first time, researchers had demonstrated the efficacy of cystic fibrosis gene therapy in humans — a goal that has seemed out of reach for more than a quarter of a century.

The success reflects not only the pay-off of persistence but the current buzz of activity in the field. A range of approaches are in play, including viral vectors as well as non-viral ones like liposomes for delivery, and classic gene therapy strategies that would add healthy genetic material to a patient’s cells, as well as cutting-edge technologies that would edit their own genetic material. So far, most of the current crop of potential approaches have only been tested in cells grown in laboratory dishes or in animal models. But all this activity reflects the field’s renewed optimism that somehow, correcting the genetic defect that causes cystic fibrosis will soon be possible.

Prototype disease

Cystic fibrosis is caused by mutations in the gene that encodes the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR). This protein sits in the cell membrane and helps regulate the flux of water and negatively charged chloride ions into and out of cells.

CFTR’s broad function means that the disease affects a variety of organs, including the lung, pancreas, liver, intestine and testes. Without functional CFTR protein, the body has trouble making sweat, digestive fluids and mucus normally. However, most people with the disease die from lung complications: the mucus that clogs the airways of cystic fibrosis patients makes their lungs vulnerable to infection and scarring, and even in developed countries half of patients die before the age of 40 years.

Cystic fibrosis was really at that moment the prototype disease to be used for gene therapy

The CFTR gene was identified in 1989, touching off a wave of enthusiasm for developing a gene therapy cure for the disorder. “Cystic fibrosis was really at that moment the prototype disease to be used for gene therapy,” says Marianne Carlon, a gene therapy researcher at Catholic University in Leuven, Belgium.

“Theoretically, cystic fibrosis is easy,” says Carlon. It’s a recessive, single-gene disorder, meaning that two mutated copies of CFTR are necessary to produce the disease — and, by extension, delivering a single functional copy of that gene to airway cells ought to alleviate it. And in the lung, gene therapy can be delivered by inhalation rather than more invasive methods.

Source: Marianne Carlon

Marianne Carlon, a gene therapy researcher at Catholic University in Leuven, Belgium, says liposomes are not very efficient at getting their genetic cargo into the host nucleus

Cystic fibrosis was also a compelling target because it is one of the most common lethal inherited diseases, with more than 90,000 sufferers worldwide, so gene therapy could help many people. Between 1993 and 2015, scientists conducted more than two dozen clinical trials involving about 450 patients[2]. Most of these were single-dose studies, and were designed to assess safety or molecular function, not clinical benefit.

The very fact that the lung is accessible through the airways to the environment means that it has a vast array of defense mechanisms

But researchers quickly discovered that gene therapy for cystic fibrosis is more complicated in practice. “The very fact that the lung is accessible through the airways to the environment means that it has a vast array of defense mechanisms,” says Chris Boyd, a medical geneticist at the University of Edinburgh and a member of the UK consortium. These defense mechanisms mean that the cells lining the airways — exactly the cells most in need of a functional copy of CFTR— perceive gene therapy delivery systems as alien invaders, and do their best to keep them out.

Source: Chris Boyd

Chris Boyd, a medical geneticist at the University of Edinburgh and a member of the UK Cystic Fibrosis Gene Therapy Consortium, says the cells lining the airways perceive gene therapy delivery systems as alien invaders, and do their best to keep them out

The delivery problem is even worse in the lungs of cystic fibrosis patients because the thick, sticky mucus characteristic of the disease presents an additional barrier to airway cell entry.

More challenging still, gene therapy for cystic fibrosis has to be performed repeatedly throughout a person’s life, since airway cells bearing the functional gene die off and are replaced by new, uncorrected ones. And the immune system learns to recognise and fight off the viruses that are often used as gene therapy vectors, so the more a treatment is administered, the less effective it becomes.

“In reality, cystic fibrosis proved to be one of the most difficult targets you could ever imagine,” says Alton.

These frustrations caused many of the initial wave of researchers to abandon the field. In the past few years, however, improvements in gene therapy tools and technologies, as well as some encouraging successes in developing gene therapies for other diseases, have sparked a resurgence of interest in cystic fibrosis gene therapy.

CFTR correctors

Meanwhile, the landscape of cystic fibrosis treatment changed radically with the development of CFTR correctors, which interact with mutant CFTR proteins to improve their function[3]. “They’re fabulous products, and it’s really quite a revolution in cystic fibrosis care,” says David Parsons, who heads the cystic fibrosis gene therapy team at the University of Adelaide in Australia. These drugs have raised the bar for gene therapy because they target the underlying molecular defect, rather than merely treating cystic fibrosis symptoms as past treatments have done.

But the drugs only help patients with a few of the nearly 2,000 known CFTR mutations. “That leaves out a lot of people,” says Parsons.

The most impressive CFTR corrector so far, ivacaftor, is most effective in those with so-called class III mutations, who total around 4% of cystic fibrosis patients. A second formulation — a combination of ivacaftor and another molecule, lumacaftor — targets the most common mutation, known as Phe508del, which accounts for about 70% of CFTR mutations in Caucasians. But its effectiveness is much more modest.

This leaves a big opening for gene therapy, since the majority of approaches to that treatment would help regardless of the mutation a patient carries.

The UK consortium’s trial, published in 2015, was open to patients with any CFTR mutation, for example (although the majority carried Phe508del, as expected given its prevalence)[1]. The team chose a liposome vector because, unlike viruses, liposomes do not trigger an immune reaction and so can be administered over and over again.

But the approach has its disadvantages. “Liposomes are nice for a proof of concept,” says Carlon, who was not involved in the work. However, they “really are not very efficient at getting their genetic cargo into the host nucleus”.

Using liposomes to deliver gene therapy in cystic fibrosis

Editorial adviser: Chris Boyd

Patients with cystic fibrosis lack functional CFTR protein, which is needed to make thin, watery mucus that keeps the lungs healthy. Normal CFTR gene can be delivered via inhalation of nebulised liposomes mixed with plasmid DNA encoding the protein. The liposomes enhance transport of the CFTR gene into host airway cells via endocytosis or direct fusion with the cell membrane. The plasmid then passes into the cell nucleus where the normal CFTR is transcribed, enabling the cell to make CFTR proteins.

The UK consortium researchers suspect that this lack of efficiency accounts for the modest clinical results seen in the trial. They say the effectiveness may be improved by delivering a larger dose to the lungs with each gene therapy treatment.

Several other groups around the world are working on other non-viral approaches to gene therapy, such as DNA nanoparticles, in which genetic material is tightly packed within a polymer coating. These nanoparticles may be especially good at penetrating the thick mucus layer in the lungs of cystic fibrosis patients[4].

Lentiviral vectors

At the same time, recent advances in viral vectors for gene therapy are causing the cystic fibrosis field to take another look at this strategy. “A virus knows how to get DNA to the nucleus — because of course that’s what viruses do, that’s how they’ve been programmed by evolution,” says Alton. “And so why would you not use a viral vector if you could?”

A virus knows how to get DNA to the nucleus — because of course that’s what viruses do, that’s how they’ve been programmed by evolution

Lentiviruses have shown promise in delivering gene therapy for other diseases, such as inherited immune deficiencies. For reasons scientists do not understand, viruses in this class do not seem to trigger the type of immune response that prevents gene therapy from being administered multiple times, so they could be a good match for cystic fibrosis as well. Multiple research groups worldwide are developing gene therapy for cystic fibrosis using lentiviral vectors.

The UK consortium’s entry in this field is based on the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV). In collaboration with a Japanese biotechnology company, they have engineered a SIV-based vector with two proteins from a mouse respiratory virus, Sendai virus, which makes it extremely efficient at getting into airway cells[5].

Lentiviral vectors may also yield longer lasting gene correction because the genetic material they deliver becomes permanently integrated into the host cell’s genome. However, this advantage also comes with a safety concern, as the genetic material could splice in at a harmful location and cause cancer. Lentiviral vectors are thought to be safer in this regard than viruses used in the early days of gene therapy, although lentiviruses have never been delivered to the human airway. The UK consortium plans to begin a trial on this in late 2017.

The outcome of that trial will determine the fate of the group’s liposome work: if the greater efficiency of the lentiviral vector pans out, the consortium will focus its efforts there, but this isn’t yet certain.

Parsons says the consortium’s viral-vector results so far look “very promising”. For the past decade, he has been working on a different lentiviral vector for cystic fibrosis gene therapy, based on the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Parsons’s protocol involves treating the airways just prior to gene therapy with lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), a molecule that causes the tight junctions between airway cells to open briefly[6].

This opening enables the gene therapy vector to reach the underside of airway cells, where this particular vector happens to be able to enter more easily. It also allows access to the stem cells that renew the airway lining, which are typically located beneath the surface of the airway.

“If you can target stem cells it changes the game,” says Parsons. Delivering a healthy copy of CFTR to airway stem cells could permit one-time gene therapy leading to permanent correction of the defect.

LPC is a molecule normally found in the lungs. However, opening the tight junctions between airway cells, even briefly, could be risky — especially in the already compromised and often bacteria-infected lungs of cystic fibrosis patients. Parsons says the procedure doesn’t cause harm in animal studies, and has a five-year plan to begin human trials.

Adeno-associated viral vectors

Other researchers are taking a new look at adeno-associated virus (AAV), a vector that was used in some early cystic fibrosis gene therapy trials but did not show effectiveness. More recently, “AAV gene therapy has been shown to be successful in other disease areas,” says Carlon, who is working on one AAV project at Catholic University. “I think that really fuelled reinvestigating this vector system for cystic fibrosis,” she adds.

AAV gene therapy has been shown to be successful in other disease areas — I think that really fuelled reinvestigating this vector system for cystic fibrosis

Early work with AAV used a form of the virus called AAV2, which isn’t very efficient at getting into airway cells. The Leuven team is working with an improved form called AAV5. They also added a stronger promoter, a region of DNA that enables a gene to be turned on.

Animal studies suggest that the vector can produce long-lasting gene expression — at least 15 months in the mouse[7]. And the researchers say they do not see a fall off in gene expression caused by an immune response to the vector, even after three doses of the therapy[8]. Next, the team plans to test whether the AAV therapy can improve lung function in a pig or ferret model of cystic fibrosis.

Additional strategies for correcting the CFTR gene make use of the latest molecular techniques. Researchers at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, have packaged a truncated version of CFTR in an AAV vector that works by transcomplementation[9]. In this process, small fragments of healthy CFTR protein encoded by the genetic material in the vector interact with the host cell’s mutant CFTR and improve its function.

In essence, this strategy gives cells the ability to make their own CFTR corrector drugs. And, as with CFTR correctors, each transcomplementation-based gene therapy product will only target one or a subset of CFTR mutations. “It’s working very well on Phe508del,” reports Liudmila Cebotaru, who is leading the project at Johns Hopkins University. But some mutations may not be able to be rescued by this strategy.

Source: Liudmila Cebotaru

Liudmila Cebotaru, a researcher at Johns Hopkins University, has packaged a truncated version of CFTR in an adeno-associated virus vector that works by transcomplementation

Other approaches using gene-editing technologies, such as CRISPR, TALENs, and zinc-finger nucleases, are also mutation-specific[10]. But gene editing, which fixes a patient’s own DNA, has some advantages over gene addition, the usual strategy for gene therapy that simply adds a healthy copy of a gene to a patient’s genome. “You’ll get the subtleties of the gene back as well,” such as when and in what amount and in what form the gene is expressed, says Patrick Harrison, who is working on this approach at University College Cork in Ireland.

Harrison’s current work targets three CFTR mutations that can all be ameliorated by cutting a few DNA base pairs out of the mutated gene. The counterintuitive strategy is a good test case for gene editing because it only requires a single step, cutting the DNA, rather than also inserting a corrected sequence. “It will be more efficient and it will be simpler,” Harrison says. “It will also work in cells that aren’t dividing very quickly, which is often the case in lung tissue.”

The only gene-editing strategy for cystic fibrosis that has been tested in humans so far is QR-010, a molecule developed by the Dutch biotechnology company ProQR to correct the Phe508del mutation, which has just entered phase I clinical trials. The company’s approach is unique in that its gene therapy aims to edit not the mutant DNA itself but the messenger RNA that the cell produces as a template for building a protein[3].

On account of its complexity, gene editing will be difficult to take from research tool to clinic, but that doesn’t mean it and any other avenues shouldn’t be investigated. “I think it’s very good for the field that there are lots of different approaches,” says Alton. “It doesn’t matter which of us gets there, it’s just important for the patients that one of us gets there.”

Drug classMechanismExamples
BronchodilatorsWiden the airways to help other medications reach the lungs.Salbutamol, salmeterol.
Mucus thinnersMake mucus less sticky so it is easier to remove from lungs through chest physical therapy or coughing.Hypertonic saline, dornase alpha, mannitol.
Pancreatic enzymesHelp the body to digest food and absorb nutrients (replacing enzymes normally produced by the body that cannot always reach the digestive system because they are blocked by thick, sticky mucus).Pancreatin.
AntibioticsFight bacterial infections that cystic fibrosis patients are prone to because the thick mucus in their airways tends to trap bacteria.Many classes of antibiotics are used in cystic fibrosis patients. Patients often take oral or inhaled antibiotics daily to prevent infection, and may need intravenous antibiotics if an infection does take hold.
CTFR correctorsFor patients with class III mutations in the gene that encodes cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), accounting for about 4% of cystic fibrosis cases: the drug helps the CFTR protein carry chloride ions across the cell membrane.Ivacaftor (Kalydeco).
CTFR correctorsFor patients with two copies of the most common cystic fibrosis mutation, Phe508del: the drug helps shepherd the CFTR protein to the surface of the cell, and ivacaftor improves its chloride transport ability.Lumacaftor/ivacaftor (Orkambi).

Citation: The Pharmaceutical Journal, June 2016, Vol 296, No 7890, online | DOI: 10.1211/PJ.2016.20201275

Recommended from Pharmaceutical Press

  • Basic Pharmacokinetics

    A clear and concise basic pharmacokinetics textbook. Shows how to apply the principles to achieve successful drug therapy.

    £54.00Buy now

  • Drugs in Use

    Optimise drug therapy for your patients. These case studies help you bridge the gap between theoretical medicines knowledge and practical applications.

    £43.00Buy now

  • Medicines Use Reviews

    Conduct successful Medicines Use Reviews (MURs) with this comprehensive book. Contains evidence-based information, tips and guidance.

    £27.00Buy now

  • Workplace Drug Testing

    Explains drug testing regulatory frameworks and all aspects of drug analysis. Case studies of successful programmes are included.

    £81.00Buy now

Search an extensive range of the world’s most trusted resources

1. Welsh MJ, Smith AE. Molecular mechanisms of CFTR chloride channel dysfunction in cystic fibrosis. Cell. 1993;73(7):1251–1254.[PubMed]

2. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Patient Registry: Annual Data Report 2010. Bethesda, MD: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation; 2010.

3. Tarran R, Button B, Picher M, et al. Normal and cystic fibrosis airway surface liquid homeostasis. The effects of phasic shear stress and viral infections. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(42):35751–35759.[PMC free article][PubMed]

4. Muhlebach MS, Noah TL. Endotoxin activity and inflammatory markers in the airways of young patients with cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165(7):911–915.[PubMed]

5. Karp CL, Flick LM, Park KW, et al. Defective lipoxin-mediated anti-inflammatory activity in the cystic fibrosis airway. Nat Immunol. 2004;5(4):388–392.[PubMed]

6. Hartl D, Griese M, Kappler M, et al. Pulmonary T(H)2 response in Pseudomonas aeruginosa-infected patients with cystic fibrosis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;117(1):204–211.[PubMed]

7. Ashlock MA, Olson ER. Therapeutics development for cystic fibrosis: a successful model for a multisystem genetic disease. Annu Rev Med. 2011;62:107–125.[PubMed]

8. Kitson C, Angel B, Judd D, et al. The extra-and intracellular barriers to lipid and adenovirus-mediated pulmonary gene transfer in native sheep airway epithelium. Gene Ther. 1999;6(4):534–546.[PubMed]

9. Zabner J, Ramsay BW, Meeker DP, et al. Repeat administration of an adenovirus vector encoding cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator to the nasal epithelium of patients with cystic fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 1996;97(6):1504–1511.[PMC free article][PubMed]

10. Schwarzt DA, Quinn TJ, Thorne PS, Sayeed S, Yi AK, Krieg AM. CpG motifs in bacterial DNA cause inflammation in the lower respiratory tract. J Clin Invest. 1997;100(1):68–73.[PMC free article][PubMed]

11. Crystal RG, McElvaney NG, Rosenfeld MA, et al. Administration of an adenovirus containing the human CFTR cDNA to the respiratory tract of individuals with cystic fibrosis. Nat Gene. 1994;8(1):42–51.[PubMed]

12. Walters RW, Grunst T, Bergelson JM, et al. Basolateral localization of fiber receptors limits adenovirus infection from the apical surface of airway epithelia. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(15):10219–10226.[PubMed]

13. Parsons DW, Grubb BR, Johnson LG, Boucher RC. Enhanced in vivo airway gene transfer via transient modification of host barrier properties with a surface-active agent. Hum Gene Ther. 1998;9(18):2661–2272.[PubMed]

14. Weiss DJ, Beckett T, Bonneau L, Young J, Kolls JK, Wang G. Transient increase in lung epithelial tight junction permeability: an additional mechanism for enhancement of lung transgene expression by perfluorochemical liquids. Mol Ther. 2003;8(6):927–935.[PubMed]

15. Zhang L, Wang D, Fischer H, et al. Efficient expression of CFTR function with adeno-associated virus vectors that carry shortened CFTR genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(17):10158–10163.[PMC free article][PubMed]

16. Song Y, Lou HH, Boyer JL, et al. Functional cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator expression in cystic fibrosis airway epithelial cells by AAV6.2-mediated segmental trans-splicing. Hum Gene Ther. 2009;20(3):267–281.[PMC free article][PubMed]

17. Ferrari S, Griesenbach U, Iida A, et al. Sendai virus-mediated CFTR gene transfer to the airway epithelium. Gene Ther. 2007;14:1371–1379.[PubMed]

18. Bishop AE. Pulmonary epithelial stem cells. Cell Prolif. 2004;37(1):89–96.[PubMed]

19. Hacein-Bey-Abina S, Garrigue A, Wang GP, et al. Insertional oncogenesis in 4 patients after retrovirus-mediated gene therapy of SCID-X1. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(9):3132–3142.[PMC free article][PubMed]

20. Johnson LG, Olsen JC, Naldini L, Boucher RC. Pseudotyped human lentiviral vector-mediated gene transfer to airway epithelia in vivo. Gene Ther. 2000;7(7):568–574.[PubMed]

21. Griesenbach U, Ferrari S, Geddes DM, Alton EWFW. Gene therapy progress and prospects: cystic fibrosis. Gene Ther. 2002;9(20):1344–1350.[PubMed]

22. Delenda C. Lentiviral vectors: optimization of packaging, transduction and gene expression. J Gene Med. 2004;6( Suppl 1):S125–S138.[PubMed]

23. Mitomo K, Griesenbach U, Inoue M, et al. Toward gene therapy for cystic fibrosis using a lentivirus pseudotyped with Sendai virus envelopes. Mol Ther. 2010;18(6):1173–1182.[PMC free article][PubMed]

24. Hyde SC, Pringle IA, Abdullah S, et al. CpG-free plasmids confer reduced inflammation and sustained pulmonary gene expression. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(5):549–551.[PubMed]

25. Engelhardt JF, Yankaskas JR, Ernst SA, et al. Submucosal glands are the predominant site of CFTR expression in the human bronchus. Nat Genet. 1992;2(3):240–248.[PubMed]

26. Engelhardt JF, Zepeda M, Cohn JA, Yankaskas JR, Wilson JM. Expression of the cystic fibrosis gene in adult human lung. J Clin Invest. 1994;93(2):737–749.[PMC free article][PubMed]

27. Sinn PL, Anthony RM, McCray PB., Jr Genetic therapies for cystic fibrosis lung disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20(R1):R79–R86.[PMC free article][PubMed]

28. Davies JC, Alton EW. Gene therapy for cystic fibrosis. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2010;7(6):408–414.[PubMed]

29. Griesenbach U, Smith SN, Farley R, Singh C, Alton EW. Validation of nasal potential difference measurements in gut-corrected CF knockout mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2008;39(4):490–496.[PubMed]

30. Knowles MR, Paradiso AM, Boucher RC. In vivo nasal potential difference: techniques and protocols for assessing efficacy of gene transfer in cystic fibrosis. Hum Gene Ther. 1995;6(4):445–455.[PubMed]

31. Accurso FJ, Rowe SM, Clancy JP, et al. Effect of VX-770 in persons with cystic fibrosis and the G551D-CFTR mutation. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(21):1991–2003.[PMC free article][PubMed]

32. Johnson LG, Boyles SE, Wilson J, Boucher RC. Normalization of raised sodium absorption and raised calcium-mediated chloride secretion by adenovirus-mediated expression of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator in primary human cystic fibrosis airway epithelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1995;95(3):1377–1382.[PMC free article][PubMed]

33. Bronsveld I, Mekus F, Bijman J, et al. Chloride conductance and genetic background modulate the cystic fibrosis phenotype of Delta F508 homozygous twins and siblings. J Clin Invest. 2001;108(11):1705–1715.[PMC free article][PubMed]

34. Simmonds NJ, D’Souza L, Roughton M, Alton EW, Davies JC, Hodson ME. Cystic fibrosis and survival to 40 years: a study of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator function. Eur Respir J. 2011;37(5):1076–1082.[PubMed]

35. Zabner J, Couture LA, Gregory RJ, Graham SM, Smith AE, Welsh MJ. Adenovirus-mediated gene transfer transiently corrects the chloride transport defect in nasal epithelia of patients with cystic fibrosis. Cell. 1993;75(2):207–216.[PubMed]

36. Knowles MR, Hohneker KW, Zhou Z, et al. A controlled study of adenoviral-vector mediated gene transfer in the nasal epithelium of patients with cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(13):823–831.[PubMed]

37. Hay JG, McElvaney NG, Herena J, Crystal RG. Modification of nasal epithelial potential differences of individuals with cystic fibrosis consequent to local administration of a normal CFTR cDNA adenovirus gene transfer vector. Hum Gene Ther. 1995;6(11):1487–1496.[PubMed]

38. Bellon G, Michel-Calemard L, Thouvenot D, et al. Aerosol administration of a recombinant adenovirus expressing CFTR to cystic fibrosis patients: a phase I clinical trial. Hum Gene Ther. 1997;8(1):15–25.[PubMed]

39. Harvey BG, Leopold PL, Hackett NR, et al. Airway epithelial CFTR mRNA expression in cystic fibrosis patients after repetitive administration of a recombinant adenovirus. J Clin Invest. 1999;104(9):1245–1255.[PMC free article][PubMed]

40. Zuckerman JB, Robinson CB, McCoy KS, et al. A phase I study of adenovirus-mediated transfer of the human cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene to a lung segment of individuals with cystic fibrosis. Hum Gene Ther. 1999;10(18):2973–2985.[PubMed]

41. Joseph PM, O’Sullivan BP, Lapey A, et al. Aerosol and lobar administration of a recombinant adenovirus to individuals with cystic fibrosis. I. Methods, safety, and clinical implications. Hum Gene Ther. 2001;12(11):1369–1382.[PubMed]

42. Perricone MA, Morris JE, Pavelka K, et al. Aerosol and lobar administration of a recombinant adenovirus to individuals with cystic fibrosis. II. Transfection efficiency in airway epithelium. Hum Gene Ther. 2001;12(11):1383–1394.[PubMed]

43. Wagner JA, Messner AH, Moran ML, et al. Safety and biological efficacy of an adeno-associated virus vector-cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (AAV-CFTR) in the cystic fibrosis maxillary sinus. Laryngoscope. 1999;109(2 Pt 1):266–274.[PubMed]

44. Aitken ML, Moss RB, Waltz DA, et al. A phase I study of aerosolized administration of tgAAVCF to cystic fibrosis subjects with mild lung disease. Hum Gene Ther. 2001;12(15):1907–1916.[PubMed]

45. Wagner JA, Nepomuceno IB, Messner AH, et al. A phase II, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of tgAAVCF using maxillary sinus delivery in patients with cystic fibrosis with antrostomies. Hum Gene Ther. 2002;13(11):1349–1359.[PubMed]

46. Flotte TR, Zeitlin PL, Reynolds TC, et al. Phase I trial of intranasal and endobronchial administration of a recombinant adeno-associated virus serotype 2 (rAAV2)-CFTR vector in adult cystic fibrosis patients: a two-part clinical study. Hum Gene Ther. 2003;14(11):1079–1088.[PubMed]

47. Moss RB, Rodman D, Spencer LT, et al. Repeated adeno-associated virus serotype 2 aerosol–mediated cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator gene transfer to the lungs of patients with cystic fibrosis: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Chest. 2004;125(2):509–521.[PubMed]

48. Moss RB, Milla C, Colombo J, et al. Repeated aerosolized AAV-CFTR for treatment of cystic fibrosis: a randomized placebo-controlled phase 2B trial. Hum Gene Ther. 2007;18(8):726–732.[PubMed]

49. Caplen NJ, Alton EW, Middleton PG, et al. Liposome-mediated CFTR gene transfer to the nasal epithelium of patients with cystic fibrosis. Nat Med. 1995;1(1):39–46.[PubMed]

50. Gill DR, Southern KW, Mofford KA, et al. A placebo-controlled study of liposome-mediated gene transfer to the nasal epithelium of patients with cystic fibrosis. Gene Ther. 1997;4(3):199–209.[PubMed]

51. Porteous DJ, Dorin JR, McLachlan G, et al. Evidence for safety and efficacy of DOTAP cationic liposome mediated CFTR gene transfer to the nasal epithelium of patients with cystic fibrosis. Gene Ther. 1997;4(3):210–218.[PubMed]

52. Hyde SC, Southern KW, Gileadi U, et al. Repeat administration of DNA/liposomes to the nasal epithelium of patients with cystic fibrosis. Gene Ther. 2000;7(13):1156–1165.[PubMed]

53. Zabner J, Cheng SH, Meeker D, et al. Comparison of DNA–lipid complexes and DNA alone for gene transfer to cystic fibrosis airway epithelia in vivo. J Clin Invest. 1997;100(6):1529–1537.[PMC free article][PubMed]

54. Alton EW, Stern M, Farley R, et al. Cationic lipid-mediated CFTR gene transfer to the lungs and nose of patients with cystic fibrosis: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 1999;353(9157):947–954.[PubMed]

55. Ruiz FE, Clancy JP, Perricone MA, et al. A clinical inflammatory syndrome attributable to aerosolized lipid–DNA administration in cystic fibrosis. Hum Gene Ther. 2001;12(7):751–761.[PubMed]

56. Konstan MW, Davis PB, Wagener JS, et al. Compacted DNA nanoparticles administered to the nasal mucosa of cystic fibrosis subjects are safe and demonstrate partial to complete cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator reconstitution. Hum Gene Ther. 2004;15(12):1255–1269.[PubMed]

0 comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *